admin
The landscape of public relations is undergoing a period of profound transformation, driven by the rapid integration of artificial intelligence, the fragmentation of traditional media, and a shift in how audiences consume information. As the industry evolves, professionals are increasingly questioning the efficacy of several high-profile trends that have dominated strategic discussions over the last 24 months. While some innovations, such as the rise of niche independent media and the professionalization of influencer relations, have become essential components of a modern communications toolkit, others are now being scrutinized as "flashes in the pan" or performative tactics that yield diminishing returns.
A recent survey of nearly 100 senior communications strategists and public relations practitioners has highlighted a growing disconnect between popular industry buzzwords and the reality of achieving meaningful brand impact. The consensus suggests that many current trends—ranging from the obsession with Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) to the relentless pursuit of "viral" moments—may be significantly overrated, often serving as distractions from the core tenets of clear messaging and human connection.
The Mirage of Generative Engine Optimization and AI Supremacy
One of the most prominent topics in the current PR discourse is Generative Engine Optimization (GEO). As search engines like Google integrate AI-driven overviews and chatbots like ChatGPT become primary information sources, many agencies have pivoted aggressively toward optimizing for these algorithms. However, seasoned strategists argue that the "newness" of GEO is largely overstated. Brad Gorman, a corporate affairs and communications strategist, notes that the industry is often guilty of "aggressively screaming about GEO" as if it were a mysterious new phenomenon rather than a logical evolution of Search Engine Optimization (SEO) tailored for an AI-integrated world.
The risk of over-indexing on AI visibility is particularly acute for small businesses and emerging brands. According to Janice Mandel, a PR strategist, many organizations are rushing to be referenced by ChatGPT and Google AI before they have solidified their fundamental messaging. The data supports this concern; while AI can process vast amounts of information, it lacks the ability to interpret nuance or emotional resonance unless the source material is exceptionally clear and strategically sound. If a brand’s message is muddled at its core, AI-driven summaries will only amplify that confusion.
Furthermore, the focus on "bot-friendly" content often comes at the expense of human engagement. Anna Rice, a PR and communications consultant, points out that brands that historically over-indexed on a single channel—whether social media ads or SEO—have often faced long-term setbacks when platform algorithms shifted. The most enduring brands are those that spark genuine human conversation and emotional connections, qualities that are currently absent from the sterile interactions provided by AI chatbots.
The Pitfalls of Content Overload and the Executive Content Factory
The democratization of content creation via AI has led to a significant increase in the volume of output, but many industry leaders argue this has not translated to an increase in value. David Kochman, senior director of communications at Gainwell Technologies, observes that the industry is witnessing an increasing volume of content simply because AI makes it possible, rather than because the content provides new insights.
This "volume-first" approach is particularly evident in the trend of turning corporate executives into "content factories." While thought leadership remains a powerful tool, Colleen Herndon Penhall, a strategic communications advisor, warns that the trend fails when it becomes "AI-assisted posting dressed up as authority." Authentic thought leadership requires original, earned perspectives. When executives post high-frequency, sanitized content, they risk diluting their personal brand and contributing to a "gray noise" that audiences have learned to ignore.
This sentiment is echoed by Lauren Guess, public relations director at State & Tell, who notes that the phrase "authentic storytelling" has itself become a buzzword that feels performative. When storytelling is executed as a mandatory checklist item rather than a genuine narrative, it defeats the purpose of building trust with an audience.
Performative Engagement and the Search for Virality
In the race for digital relevance, many social media teams have adopted a tactic of posting "funny" or snarky comments under viral posts from unrelated brands or celebrities. While this was once a novel way to show a brand’s personality, Megan P. Sweeney of the American Staffing Association argues that it has become excessive. The "noise" created by a refrigerator company commenting on celebrity drama rarely contributes to long-term brand equity and can often appear desperate or out of touch.
Similarly, the obsession with "going viral" is being reassessed. Lizi Sprague, co-founder of Songue PR, suggests that the industry has glamorized reach to the point of forgetting the target audience. High-reach numbers are often "vanity metrics" that do not translate to brand loyalty or sales conversions. In many cases, a targeted campaign reaching 5,000 key decision-makers is infinitely more valuable than a viral video seen by five million people who have no intention of engaging with the brand.
Media Relations: Debunking the Myth of Guaranteed Coverage
The relationship between PR professionals and journalists is also under scrutiny. A common misconception that persists among clients and some junior practitioners is that strong reporter relationships equate to guaranteed coverage. Jenny Beres, co-founder of Pink Shark PR, emphasizes that while relationships are vital for getting a foot in the door, they are not a substitute for a compelling, newsworthy story.
Furthermore, Suzanne Struglinski, a media and marketing consultant, warns against the trend of "guaranteed coverage" packages offered by some vendors. These often turn out to be nothing more than brand content or press release repostings disguised as editorial coverage. Such tactics may provide a temporary boost in "clips," but they lack the third-party credibility that defines true earned media.
Nikki Festa O’Brien, CEO of Greenough Communications, argues that media coverage pushes without a broader brand campaign are a missed opportunity. "Coverage gets you seen; a campaign gets you remembered," she notes. In the modern era, editorial coverage must be supported by owned content, social media assets, and account-based marketing (ABM) to create a cohesive brand presence that AI engines and human audiences alike can recognize and trust.
The Strategic Gaps in Platform Trends
As platforms like Reddit gain influence—both as a source of "human" information and as a data training ground for AI—some PR firms are rushing to "conquer" the platform. However, Evgenia Zaslavskaya, founder of ZECOMMS Agency, cautions that Reddit is not a simple PR channel. It requires a sophisticated, community-first strategy. Brands that attempt to "seed" posts or force themselves into conversations without understanding the platform’s unique culture often face severe backlash, leading to negative brand sentiment.
There is also a growing skepticism toward the proliferation of "vendor reports." Anya Nelson, public relations practice lead at Scratch Marketing + Media, notes that while original data was a "hot commodity" in the late 2010s, the market is now saturated. Reporters are increasingly skeptical of surveys commissioned by brands to support a specific narrative. Unless the data tells a truly unique story that steps outside of the organization’s immediate value proposition, it is no longer an effective PR strategy.
The Evolution of Trust and Radical Transparency
The final category of overrated trends involves the packaging of "radical transparency." Christine Kim, founder of The ATTN Economy, argues that staged CEO confessionals and scripted "we’re not perfect" moments have become a new form of spin. Audiences are increasingly savvy and can distinguish between a brand genuinely reckoning with an issue and one that is managing perception through "crisis-adjacent storytelling." Without real accountability, these displays of openness are viewed as hollow.
Simultaneously, the trend of "silence" in the face of AI-driven attacks is becoming a dangerous liability. Dan Cohen, senior director of communications at Chicago Fire FC, warns that leaders are often unprepared for the speed at which AI-generated misinformation can escalate. The "wait and see" approach is increasingly obsolete in an era where fake images or out-of-context quotes can spark national outrage in hours.
Chronology of the Trend Cycle (2010–2024)
To understand why these trends are currently viewed as overrated, it is helpful to look at the timeline of PR’s strategic evolution over the last decade:
- 2010–2015: The Social Media Gold Rush. PR shifted from traditional press releases to social media engagement. "Virality" became the primary KPI for many digital-first agencies.
- 2016–2020: The Rise of the Influencer and Data-Driven Storytelling. Brands began shifting budgets from traditional media to influencers. "Original data reports" became the standard for B2B PR.
- 2021–2022: The Authenticity Pivot. Following the pandemic, brands focused on "purpose-driven" messaging and "radical transparency" to rebuild trust with skeptical consumers.
- 2023–Present: The AI Explosion and Content Saturation. The release of LLMs (Large Language Models) led to an explosion of automated content and a focus on SEO/GEO, leading to the current state of "content fatigue" and the reassessment of these tactics.
Implications for the Future of Communications
The move away from these overrated trends suggests a return to fundamental PR principles: strategy, clarity, and genuine human connection. As AI continues to commoditize content production, the value of high-level strategic thinking and unique, human-led storytelling will only increase.
Data from recent industry reports indicates that while 75% of communications leaders are experimenting with AI, the most successful firms are those using technology to enhance, rather than replace, human creativity. The brands that will thrive in the coming years are those that resist the urge to chase every digital fad and instead focus on building a consistent, credible brand presence across multiple channels.
In conclusion, the "overrated" nature of these trends stems from their application as shortcuts. Whether it is using AI to churn out endless blog posts or trying to "hack" an algorithm for visibility, these tactics often bypass the hard work of building real relationships with audiences. As the industry matures, the focus is likely to shift back toward quality over quantity, and meaningful impact over superficial reach.
